- Employer Branding
- HR Marketing
- Recruiting
- HR Services
- HR Development
- Shop
- About ARTS
Conflict discussions in the workplace are often unavoidable. Different personalities come together with different opinions and expectations and can cause tension. In addition to the fact that the numbers have to be right and long-term strategies have to be developed, the task of a manager is also to put out fires and thus resolve conflicts in the best possible way. Conflict discussions within your own team are a real challenge and at the same time are situations that every manager is likely to experience in the course of their career. In this article, we show you how to approach conflicts constructively and fairly, what types of disputes there are and how you can see conflict discussions as an opportunity and not just as a disruptive factor.
There are many reasons for this, because wherever people work together, misunderstandings, differing expectations and mistakes can occur that trigger a conflict between two or more people. As this disrupts the team structure and co-operation, a conflict should not be silently accepted. People often try to avoid escalating the conflict by remaining silent and preserving harmony instead of simply holding conflict discussions. Unfortunately, avoiding the necessary confrontation with the situation that has arisen or differing opinions leads to a loss of trust and solidarity in the long term and therefore to hardened fronts or an even greater conflict.
The drama of a conflict in a team is particularly evident in the economic consequences and personal impact on people. According toone study, as many as 25% of the people surveyed were experiencing conflict at work at the time of the survey. The main effects described by the respondents were
and also physical symptoms such as
On a business level, consequential costs can be calculated due to, among other things
observe.
Every single one of these consequences of conflict should be worth addressing at an early stage through conflict conversations - in reality, to make matters worse, these consequences seldom occur alone, but rather accumulate into a complex of problems. With 25% of employees affected, this results in a considerable burden that adds up to massive follow-up costs.
Therefore, we would like to support you with the following tips for a good conflict conversation in order to avoid or end these effects on your team. With a well-planned conflict discussion and a win-win solution, the motivation of the conflict participants can often be increased even beyond the previous level, since the participants feel taken seriously and the solution contributes to improved working conditions.
The simple answer is: no, unfortunately not. Because there are many different types, conditions and backgrounds that can lead to critical situations. Let's look at just one aspect of many:
The role of the manager: part of the conflict or mediating role
Whether you as a manager are part of the conflict in the resolution process or not has a serious impact on how you can resolve the conflict yourself. A classic two-way conflict in day-to-day management can be, for example, poor performance or certain employee misbehaviour. This conflict can generally be resolved very well through well-prepared and conducted 1:1 conflict discussions. In another case, part of the team could be in conflict with the manager, triggered for example by unfortunate communication or a management style that is unsuitable for the employees. The manager will find it difficult to resolve this conflict on their own, as they are personally involved and the reasons and drivers of the conflict are less easy to disclose. This is easier for a neutral person who is involved in conflict discussions as a mediator. The third possibility is that a conflict arises within the team that is independent of the manager. In this case, the manager can take on the neutral mediating role, but there is a risk that, as part of the system, he or she will become a party to the conflict as a result of this ‘interference’. It is therefore recommended that a mediator be brought in as an external, neutral third party in the case of larger, entrenched conflicts.
When you walk into the room and things are literally flying, you immediately realise that there is a conflict. However, there are also conflicts that are not recognisable at first glance, as they bubble under the surface and work quietly and silently. A distinction is made between hot and cold conflicts. Open hot conflicts are easily recognisable and therefore easier to handle and resolve. The issue and the parties involved are open and can be directly involved in the conflict discussions. Cold conflicts are more difficult because they can only be recognised by looking and listening carefully. Destructive behaviour, blockages and minimised, formal contact between team members are often noticeable. If these behaviours are noticed, the first step is to find out who is involved and what the history of the conflict is. It is important to know the history of the conflict in order to resolve it, as cold conflicts are often the result of unsatisfactorily resolved hot conflicts. Many unpleasant feelings and stressful situations have built up over the course of the conflict. In order to be able to enter into conflict resolution at all, this conflict must first be openly named. Only then can conflict discussions take place.
We can see that in many cases the manager can resolve the conflict well on their own or with meditative support. Conflict discussions can be a challenge, but with the right preparation, a systematic approach and empathetic communication, they end up being a win-win situation for everyone involved.
We have summarised a few tips that will give youconfidence in conducting the conversation and reliably initiate the resolution process:
S as in: describe the facts
"I noticed that..."
A as in: Describe impact
"To me, this means..."
G like: Name feelings
"It makes me feel..."
E like: Asking how he/she sees the situation
"What is your view of it? How did it come about?"
S as in: find conclusion
"For the future, I wish for ... / What do you wish for?"
Preventing conflicts, however, is more resource-efficient than going through the emotionally exhausting and time-consuming conflict resolution process afterwards. When human relationships falter, the impact on effective teamwork is immense; accordingly, conflict prevention is an important leadership task to avoid this spiral.
Investing in prevention, for example through relationship management, appreciative and empathetic communication, and a good flow of information, not only pays off in avoiding conflict, but also improves collaboration and thus the performance of the team as a whole.
Investing time, dialogue and attention in prevention and conflict resolution is therefore worthwhile. If you use the techniques described above, it is not that difficult to resolve even seemingly unsolvable conflicts satisfactorily. And if in doubt, you can always call in a mediator.
It all depends on the perspective: Well-managed conflict discussions show where change is needed and help everyone involved to develop personally. In this way, a conflict that has been overcome can actually be seen as a win-win situation. A practised, open culture of dialogue has the same effect, avoiding actual conflicts.
Would you like to delve deeper into this topic or prepare your managers for difficult conflict discussions? Then we can recommend our communication training programme "Employee appraisals - further development through appreciation ’. Our experts will show you how to approach annual appraisals, salary negotiations, disciplinary meetings or even meetings to recognise special achievements. You will learn how to convey your personal message in a targeted manner, strike the right tone, find the right words and react appropriately and sensitively to emotions.